The moment I entered Audubon Park I analyzed my surroundings through a journalistic/photographic lens. The picturesque background seemed as if it belonged in a magazine and so I attempted to capture every moving creature in a photograph. I watched as the ducks created a rippling effect as they waded through the water and as the tree branches gently swayed over the lagoon. Through a photographic perspective, the park is rich in vegetation and the interaction between the wildlife (i.e. birds, ducks, squirrels) and plants was beautiful. In relation to journalism, I began by considering the purpose of the park and whether or not it fit the needs of it's visitors. Out of curiosity I asked two Loyola students that visit the park regularly. Although they both said that it was "beautiful" and has "something for everyone", like a golf course and park for children, it would be nice if it had more recreational areas like tennis and volleyball courts. I also began to think about the park's peak hours and when it is safest to walk. Based on experience, I concluded that it is most full between 3-5pm. After some brief research, I discovered that criminal acts, such as rape, have taken place at Audubon Park. For this reason visitors -- especially those in small groups -- should visit during peak hours.
Through the perspective of a biologist, I analyzed the park in a completely different way. I first began by observing the diversity of the bird species, and quickly noticed how they were all so different. From merely strolling beside the front lake, I saw approximately six different kinds of birds (mallard, swan, crane, etc.). I then began to consider the close proximity the park has with urban life, and whether it affects the well being of the wildlife at all. I noticed a significant amount of litter around the park benches and I couldn't help but wonder how the presence of joggers, restless children, and even horseback riders impacts the natural habitat.
No comments:
Post a Comment